TARSEM SINGH vs UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED AND OTHERS

1 CWP-9889-2026 & CWP-9882-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-9889-2026 1) Tarsem Singh ...Petitioner VERSUS Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited and others ...Respondents 2) CWP-9882-2026 Satpal Singh ...Petitioner VERSUS Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited and others ...Respondents Reserved on: 02.04.2026 Pronounced on:01.05.2026 Uploaded on:01.05.2026 Whether only the operative part of the judgment is pronounced? No Whether full judgment is pronounced? Yes CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Mr. Vikas Chatrath, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Yashica, Advocate for the petitioner in CWP-9889-2026. Mr. Yesh Paul Malik, Advocate for the petitioner in CWP- 9882-2026. Mr. Prince Singh, Advocate for the respondents in both cases. PUNEET CHAWLA 2026.05.01 18:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 CWP-9889-2026 & CWP-9882-2026 **** HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. 1. This common order shall dispose of both the aforementioned writ petitions as they arise from a similar factual matrix and pose identical questions of law. However, for the sake of brevity, the facts are taken from CWP-9889-2026. 2. The present petition has been fil