TARLOK SINGH vs P.N.B.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H ARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (224) RSA-3025-2002 (O&M) Date of Decision:-21.05.2026 TARLOK SINGH AND OTHERS … Appellants Versus PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: None for the appellants. Mr. Paul S. Saini, Advocate for respondent No.3. **** VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J. (Oral) 1. None appeared on behalf of the appellants. Even on the last date of hearing, none appeared for the appellants. It seems that appellants have lost interest in pursuing the appeal. 2. As such, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the case on the docket, indefinitely. 3. Accordingly, the instant appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution. 4. As a natural corollary, since the main case stands dismissed for want of prosecution of, all pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of, as no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping them pending. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) st 21 May, 2026 JUDGE Poonam Whether reasoned / speaking? Yes / No Whether reportable? Yes / No POONAM 2026.05.22 05:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document