Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-27

TARLOCHAN SINGH vs JAGJIT KAUR

Citation / case number
CR 4425/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
TARLOCHAN SINGH
Respondent
JAGJIT KAUR
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

- 1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 122 CR-4425-2026 Date of decision: 27.05.2026 TARLOCHAN SINGH ....Petitioner Versus JAGJIT KAUR ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR Present : Mr. Onkar Rai, Advocate for the petitioner. YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR. J.(Oral) 1. The present revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed for setting aside the impugned order dated 30.04.2026 (Annexure P-8) passed by learned Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Ludhiana, whereby the application for amendment of plaint has been allowed. 2. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the material placed on the file. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner argued that the impugned order vide which the application for amendment of plaint has been allowed is cryptic and illegal and the trial Court has committed a manifest error while allowing the application at the final stage of the suit by allowing plaintiff to include some more properties, whereas, the amendment should have been sought before the commencement of trial. Earlier, the application moved by the plaintiff for amendment of plaint was also rejected which sho