Delhi High Court · 2026-05-21
TANNIA RIKHY AND OTHERS vs SUNRIDER INDIA PVT. LTD.
- Citation / case number
- RFA-32/2023 2026:DHC:4564
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Petitioner
- TANNIA RIKHY AND OTHERS
- Respondent
- SUNRIDER INDIA PVT. LTD.
Judgment text excerpt
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on: 23rd March, 2026 Pronounced on: 21st May, 2026 + RFA 32/2023 & CM APPL. 1770/2023 1. TANNIA RIKHY W/o Late Dr. Aneil Dilip Singh Rikhy R/o SMR House, 4, Basant Lok, Community Centre, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi. 2. MR. SHAUN S. RIKHY S/o Late Dr. Aneil Dilip Singh Rikhy R/o SMR House, 4, Basant Lok, Community Centre, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi. 3. MR. MANICK HARPAL RIKHY S/o Late Dr. Aneil Dilip Singh Rikhy, R/o SMR House, 4, Basant Lok, Community Centre, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi. .....Appellants Through: Appearance not given. versus SUNRIDER INDIA PVT. LTD. Plot No. 495, Udyog Vihar, Phase-III, Gurgaon, Haryana. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Nihit Nagpal, Mr. Vaibhav Mehra, Mr. Vikrant Rana and Ms. Lucy Rana, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G M E N T NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J. Signature Not Verified RFA 32/2023 Page 1 of 15 Digitally Signed By:ANIL KUMAR BHATT Signing Date:21.05.2026 17:16:57 1. Regular First Appeal under Section 96 read with Order XLI Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as “CPC”) has been preferred by the Appellants/Defendants against the Judgment and Decree dated 21.09.2022, whereby the learned District Judge has decreed the Suit for Recovery filed by the Plaintiff/Respondent in its favour for a sum of Rs.5,53,077/- along with interest @ 9.03% per annum, with effect from, 31.01.2014 till its realization. 2. The Plaintiff, a Company registered under Companies Act, 1956 had filed a Suit for Recovery bearing No. CS 56966/2016 for recovery of Rs.5,53,077/- along with interest @ 18% per annum, through Sh. Ajay Gupta, Regional Manager, India Operation, who was duly authorised to file the said Suit, vide Resolution dated 30.05.2014. 3. It was the case