SUSHMA vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 167 CWP-17465-2026 Date of Decision: 27.05.2026 SUSHMA ...Petitioner Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. …Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Rajesh Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Svaneel Jaswal, Addl. A.G. Haryana *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of communication whereby his claim for compensation under Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Antyodaya Parivar Suraksha Yojna (for short ‘Deen Dayal Yojna’) has been rejected on the ground of delay. 2. As per petition, the petitioner’s husband passed away on 19.06.2023. His annual family income as per Parivar Pehchan Patra was less than ₹1,80,000/-. The petitioner filed online application on 20.04.2024 seeking compensation under Deen Dayal Yojna. The respondent has rejected his claim on the ground that application was filed beyond 90 days. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there was delay of 7 months in issuance of death certificate which resulted delay in filing the claim. The instant case is squarely covered by order dated 0