Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-21

SUSHIL KUMAR @ SUSHIL KUMAR SINGH vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 10648/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SUSHIL KUMAR @ SUSHIL KUMAR SINGH
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-10648-2026 (O & M) ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (216) CRM-M-10648-2026 (O & M) Date of decision:21.05.2026 Sushil Kumar @ Sushil Kumar Singh …... Petitioner V/s State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Ram Kumar Saini, Advocate, with Mr. Ankit Saini, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Geeta Rani, AAG, Haryana. ***** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (Oral) The prayer in this petition under Section 483 BNSS, 2023 is for the grant of the regular bail to the petitioner in FIR No.332 dated 09.10.2025 under Sections 212(a), 318(4), 319, 336(3), 338, 340(2), 61(2) of BNS, 2023 registered at Police Station Ambala City, District Ambala. 2. As per the allegations levelled, the petitioner arranged fake surety and produced fake surety and identifier, through, co-accused Heena and the petitioner paid Rs.15,000/- through Paytm to co-accused Heena on 09.10.2025 i.e. the date on which the fake surety and identifier had been produced before the Court. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. Taking the allegations to be correct, the offence is triab