Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-04

SUSHIL AND ORS vs ROHTASH

Citation / case number
RSA 455/2017
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SUSHIL AND ORS
Respondent
ROHTASH
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

RSA-455-2017 (O & M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 240 Regular Second Appeal No.455 of 2017 (O & M) Date of decision :-04.05.2026 Sushil and others …..Appellants Versus Rohtash …..Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present:- Mr. Ashok Tyagi, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. K.B. Sharma, Advocate for the respondent. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) The appellants/defendants have filed the present appeal against the concurrent findings of the learned Courts below whereby the suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff for specific performance of the agreement to sell dated 14.3.2008 with consequential relief of prohibitory injunction has been decreed. At the outset, learned counsel for the appellants submits that the dispute between the parties has been amicably resolved by way of a Compromise Deed dated 24.04.2026. A copy of the said compromise has been handed over in Court, which is taken on record and marked as Annexure A-1. A copy thereof has also been supplied to learned counsel for the respondent. VIJAY ASIJA 2026.05.04 18.49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document RSA-455-2017 (O & M) 2 It is further submitted that in terms of Clause 8