Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-01

SURJIT SINGH VOHRA vs THE CONFED AND ANOTHER

Citation / case number
RSA 1541/2002
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SURJIT SINGH VOHRA
Respondent
THE CONFED AND ANOTHER
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

208 RSA-1541-2002 Date of Decision: May 01, 2026 Surjit Singh Vohra … Appellant Versus The Confed through its District Manager and another …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- Mr. Abhishek Shukla, Advocate for Ms. Garima Jindal, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Amit Jaiswal, Advocate for respondent No.1. DEEPAK GUPTA, J.(Oral) Learned counsel for the appellant has placed on record the copy of the statement dated 25.01.2003, which was made by learned counsel for the decree holder – Confed (respondent No.1 herein), whereby he had received a cheque of `99,000/- before the Execu/ng Court and had specifically stated that the execu/on stood sa/sfied. Therea3er, the appellant herein, i.e. J.D. had made a statement that in case, his RSA pending before this Court is accepted, then he will be en/tled to receive back the money paid by him. 2. Pursuant to the aforesaid statement of both the sides, the execu/on was disposed of as sa/sfied by the Execu/ng Court on 25.01.2003. 3. Today, learned counsel for the appellant submits that in view of the fact that the amount has already been deposited by the appellant before the Execu/ng Court and the execu/on stands sa/sfied, the a