SURJIT KAUR @ SEETO vs STATE OF PUNJAB

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 244 CRM-M No.27048 of 2026 Date of Decision: 18.05.2026 Surjit Kaur @ Seeto ... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Amandeep Singh Manaise, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Vivek Sharma, AAG, Punjab, for the respondent-State. *** MANISHA BATRA, J. (Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (For short “BNSS”) seeking regular bail in the FIR mentioned below:- FIR No. Dated Police Station Sections 49 11.04.2026 Lohian, District 109, 333, 324(4), 191(2) Jalandhar Rural and 190 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (For short “BNS”) and 25 of Arms, Act, 1959 2. Brief facts relevant for the purpose of disposal of this petition are that the aforementioned FIR was registered on the basis of statement recorded by the complainant Paramjit Kaur alleging that on 11.04.2026, she along with her nephew Harjinder Singh, his wife Saroj MANJU 2026.05.19 10:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order /judgment Chandigarh CRM-M No.27048 of 2026 -2- Rani and grandson Sahil was going