SURINDER SINGH AND ANR vs STATE OF PUNJAB

CRR-2579-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 204 CRR-2579-2012 Date of Decision: 04.05.2026 SURINDER SINGH AND ANOTHER ......... Pe((oners Versus STATE OF PUNJAB ......... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present None for the pe oners. Mr. Akshay Kumar, A.A.G, Punjab. **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL) 1. On the last date of hearing, none had appeared on behalf of the pe oners. Even today, none has appeared on their behalf. It appears the pe oners are no more interested to pursue the present pe on. 2. Given above, the present pe on stands dismissed for non-prosecu on. It is clarified that the Registry shall not entertain any applica on for restora on to the present pe on. However, liberty is reserved to the pe oners to file a fresh pe on, in case need arises. It is further clarified that the me for which the present pe on is pending before this Court shall not be counted for the purpose of limita on and the limita on will start from tomorrow, which shall have to be explained. All pending miscellaneous applica ons, if any, stand disposed of. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 04.05.2026 Jyo-II Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No JYOTI