SURINDER KAUR vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

383 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RFA No. 1266 of 2022 (O&M) Date of Decision: 19.05.2026 Surinder Kaur ...Appellant Versus State of Punjab and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mr. Nitish Kaushal, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Additional Advocate General, Punjab for respondent No. 1. None for respondent No. 2-GMADA. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) CM No. 3301-CI of 2022 Notice of the instant application re:condonation of delay of 711 days in filing the appeal was issued on 29.09.2023. No reply has been filed, however, learned State Counsel vehemently opposes the prayer made in the application. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the contents of the application. Concededly, the other similarly situated landowners pertaining to the same acquisition proceedings have already been held entitled for the enhanced amount of compensation pertaining to the acquired land falling in the same revenue estate, i.e. Village Hoshiarpur, Tehsil Kharar, District Mohali, to the tune of DINESH KUMAR 2026.05.22 09:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document RFA No. 1266 of 2022 (O&M)