Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-26

SURESH KUMAR vs SDO UHBVN SUB DIVISION MURTHAL AND ANOTHER

Citation / case number
CR 4449/2023
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SURESH KUMAR
Respondent
SDO UHBVN SUB DIVISION MURTHAL AND ANOTHER
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 264 CR-4449-2023 Date of Decision: 26.05.2026 SURESH KUMAR ....Petitioner V/s SDO UHBVN SUB DIVISION MURTHAL AND ANOTHER .…Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present: Ms. Palak Jain, Advocate for Mr. Gopal Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anil Chawla, Advocate for the respondents. *** VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the parties are ad-idem that since the suit itself stands dismissed, the instant revision petition has been rendered infructuous. 2 Keeping in view the statement made by learned counsel for the parties, the instant revision petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. 3. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (VIKRAM AGGARWAL) JUDGE May 26, 2026 Mani Kumar Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No MANI KUMAR 2026.05.27 18:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document