SURENDRA KUMAR CHATURVEDI & ANR. vs DELHI STATE INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED

Judgment text excerpt

$~114 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : 18.05.2026 + CONT.CAS(C) 882/2026 SURENDRA KUMAR CHATURVEDI & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Abhik Chimni, Mr. Gurupal Singh, Mr. Pranjal Abrol, Mr. Ayan Dasgupta and Ms. Moksha Sharma, Advs. versus DELHI STATE INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Ms. Maneesha Dhir, Ms. Varsha Banjerjee and Mr. Akash Srivastava, Advs. for DSIIDC. Mr. Waseem Ahmed, Legal Assistant, DSIIDC (through v/c) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA SACHIN DATTA, J. (ORAL) CM APPL.33254/2026 (Exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. Application stands disposed of. CONT.CAS(C) 882/2026 3. The present petition alleges wilful disobedience of the order dated 02.12.2025, passed in LPA 1200/2024. The operative directions contained therein are as under: “17. In view of the aforesaid, the appeal is partly allowed, and the order of the learned Single Judge is modified to the extent that the respondent is directed to refund the cost deposited by the appellants pursuant to the allotment made by them, which was cancelled by means of the Order dated 14.02.2012. Since the appellants themselves did not Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed CONT.CAS(C) 882/2026 Page 1 of 2 By:CHINU LUTHRA Signing Date:20.05.2026 14:41:43 fulfil the condition of furnishing the original documents relating to allotment initially, rather they surrendered the said documents only on 09.11.2020 and thereafter, they made the application seeking refund on 08.09.2020, as such they shall also be entitled to interest at the rate of 6% per annum, in addition to the cost deposited by the appellants only from the date of the application. The respondent/Corporation is directed to ascertain the total amount d