SURENDER vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

CWP-7032-2022 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (211) CWP-7032-2022 Date of Decision : 06.05.2026 Surender …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present: Mr. Lalit Kumar Yadav, Advocate for Mr. V.K. Dhariwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Kapil Bansal, DAG, Haryana for respondents No.1 to 3. None for respondents No.4 to 6. **** KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (ORAL) 1. The legality of order dated 23.12.2021 (Annexure P-5), as passed by learned Deputy Commissioner cum District Collector, Bhiwani (respondent No.3), has been put to challenge by the petitioner/senior citizen, wherethrough, the appeal preferred by petitioner/senior citizen, under Section 16 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (for short ‘the Act of 2007), was dismissed. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner/senior citizen, has addressed the principle legal argument, to the effect, that impugned order dated 23.12.2021 (Annexure P-5), is void being coram non judice. He submits that Govt. of Haryana through the relevant notification dated 08.12.2020, issued by MANPREET SINGH Social Justice, Empowerment, Welfare