Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-13

SURENDER vs SOMBIR

Citation / case number
CR 4616/2024
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SURENDER
Respondent
SOMBIR
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CR-4616-2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 345-2 CR-4616-2024 Date of decision : 13.05.2026 Surender ...... Petitioner versus Sombir ...... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN **** Present: Mr. Ajay Kumar Gupta, Advocate and Mr. Hritik Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. J.P. Sharma, Advocate for the respondent. **** PANKAJ JAIN, J. (Oral) 1. Present revision petition is directed against the order dated 23.04.2024 passed by Additional District Judge, Charkhi Dadri, whereby the appeal preferred by the petitioner against judgment and decree dated 30.08.2022 passed in Civil Miscellaneous No.28 of 2016 titled as ‘Surender vs. Sombir’ by Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Charkhi Dadri has been dismissed on account of delay without adverting to merits. The appeal was preferred with the delay of 37 days. 2. In the considered opinion of this Court, the Appellate Court ought not have non-suited the petitioner for having filed appeal with the delay of 37 days and should have condoned the same, more so, when the condonation was being sought on account of fault of the counsel. DINESH KUMAR 2026.05.19 18:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this docu