SUPRIYA vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 238 CRM-M-12966-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 12.05.2026 Supriya ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and Others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ***** Present : None for the petitioner ***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned State counsel has filed affidavit dated 11.05.2026 of Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sub Division, Kharar-I, which is taken on record. He refers to para 3 whereof, which reads thus: “ That with regard to the complaint (Annexure P-2) given by the petitioner as mentioned in para No. 5 of the earlier affidavit, the enquiry was conducted by the deponent by associating the petitioner as well as the police officials namely ASI Angrej Singh No. 230/SAS Nagar, Constable Ajay Gill No. 982/SAS Nagar, Lady Constable Rajwinder Kaur No. 1767/SAS Nagar and Lady Constable Husandeep Kaur No. 2210/SAS Nagar, and by perusing the entire record. During enquiry, it transpired that the petitioner did not produce any concrete evidence or witness in support of the allegations mentioned in her complaint (Annexure P-2) regarding molestation and bad touch by the police officials, and she herself stated that