SUNNY vs COMMISSIONER CGST COMMISSIONERATE LUDHIANA AND ANR

Sr. No.148 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-12775-2026 Date of Decision : 18.05.2026 SUNNY …PETITIONER Versus COMMISSIONER, CGST COMMISSIONERATE, LUDHIANA AND ANR …RESPONDENTS CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present : Mr. Shivam Sharma, Advocate and Ms. Shruti Garg, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sourabh Goel, Senior Standing Counsel with Ms. Himanshi Gautam, Advocate for the respondents. *** DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he be permitted to withdraw this petition to enable the petitioner to avail of his remedy under Section 30 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, seeking revocation of the impugned order dated 06.04.2026 (Annexure P-7). Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Since the petitioner is out of business, we expect that if any application, for which liberty has been sought and got through the instant order, is filed by the petitioner, the same shall be finally disposed of by the competent authority, within one month of its filing, in accordance with law. (DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE 18.05.2026 (LAPITA BANERJI) Prince JUDGE Whether reportable : Ye