Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-05

SUNNY PATHAK AND OTHERS vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

Citation / case number
CRA-S 660/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SUNNY PATHAK AND OTHERS
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRA-S-660-2026 (O&M) “1 scnrc ron TE IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 207 CRA-S-660-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 05.05.2026 SUNNY PATHAK AND OTHERS .... Appellants Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present:- Mr. Amit Arora, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Amritpal Singh Gill, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Jagdish Singh Mehal, Advocate for the respondent No.2. 2k 2k 2 2 RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The present appeal is being preferred under Section 14A (2) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (as amended) against the order dated 12.2.2026 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Tarn Taran vide which the bail application of the appellants under section 482 BNSS stands dismissed. 2. Brief facts of the present case, as per the prosecution, are that the appellants in connivance with each other attacked upon the complainant, beat him, removed his turban, abused him publicly by uttering derogatory words against his caste and hurt his religious feelings. Hence the present FIR. 3. Learned counsel for the appellants contends that the present case has been filed by concoct