Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-29

SUNITA vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

Citation / case number
CWP 17613/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SUNITA
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 114 CWP-17613-2026 (O&M) Decided on :29.05.2026 SUNITA ...Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA PRESENT: Mr. Balwant Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. **** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (Oral) 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the elections for ward No. 2 of the Municipal Council, Rupnagar, have already been undertaken and therefore, the present petition may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further with liberty to file a fresh election petition, if need arises. 2. Ordered accordingly. 3. Pending civil miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE ( DEEPAK MANCHANDA ) JUDGE 29.05.2026 Riya Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No RIYA 2026.05.29 18:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document