Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-20

SUNITA vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 27659/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SUNITA
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-27659-2026 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 221 CRM-M-27659-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 20.05.2026 SUNITA ... PETITIONER Versus STATE OF HARYANA .. RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present:- Mr. Ashwani Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner. Dr. Malvika Singh, DAG, Haryana. *** H.S. Grewal, J.(Oral) CRM-21634-2026 1. Allowed as prayed for. CRM-M-27659-2026 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (erstwhile Section 439 Cr.P.C.) seeking regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.397 dated 14.08.2021, registered under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the IPC (now Sections 103(1), 238 and 3(5) of the BNS), at Police Station Meham, District Rohtak. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the complainant-Satish stated that his brother-in-law (Satyawan) was married to Sunita (petitioner) in the year 1990 and he was having two sons and one daughter. The elder son, namely Karampal @ Rahul, and another son, namely Vikas, were unmarried and both of them were living with their mother-Sunita. Karampal @ Rahul (deceased) SONIA GUGNANI 2026.05.21 16.52 I attest to the accuracy and