SUNITA DEVI vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRM-M-30571-2026 1 168 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-30571-2026 Sunita Devi ....Petitioner versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondents Date of decision: May 29, 2026 Date of Uploading: May 29, 2026 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: Mr. Mahesh Inder Preet, Advocate for Mr. Jarnail Singh Saneta, Advocate for the petitioner. ***** SUMEET GOEL, J. (ORAL) The substantive prayer made in the petition in hand reads thus: “It is, therefore, respectfully prayed that this petition may kindly be allowed and the appropriate direction may kindly be issued to the respondent No.4 not to interfere in the free plying of the vehicle of the petitioner bearing registration HR-45-D-6473 in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India reported in RCR Criminal 2007(2) page 76 titled as "ICICI Bank Ltd. Vs Parkash Kaur and others" and Judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India reported in SLP (Crl.) No. 4935 of 2006 decided on 15.5.2008 in case titled as "ICICI Bank Vs. Shanti Devi Sharma & Ors", keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case; in the interest of justice.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the pet