Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-13

SUNITA AND OTHERS vs OMPARKASH AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
FAO 2399/2025
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SUNITA AND OTHERS
Respondent
OMPARKASH AND OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

FAO-2399-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 135 FAO-2399-2025(O&M) Date of decision: 13.05.2026 Sunita & Others ...Appellant(s) Vs. Omparkash & Others ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present:- Mr. Pankaj Attri, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Lalit Garg, Advocate for respondent No.3. *** NIDHI GUPTA, J. CM-7586-CII-2025 This is an application under Section 5 of Limitation Act for condonation of delay of 176 days in filing the appeal. After going through the contents of the application, which is supported by affidavit of the appellant No.1, the same is allowed subject to all just exceptions and delay of 176 days in filing present appeal is condoned. MAIN CASE Present appeal has been filed by the claimants seeking enhancement of compensation of Rs.22,82,000/- awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bhiwani (hereinafter ‘the learned Tribunal’) vide Award dated 16.07.2024 passed in MACT Petition No.RBT-179 dated 01.07.2022 filed under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act (hereinafter “the Act”). The 4 claimants are the 32-year-old widow, 12-year-old son, 10-year- SUNENA 2026.05.14 17:01 I agree to specified portions of this document