SUNITA AND ORS vs UTTRI HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM AND ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 222 CWP-3601-2024 Date of Decision: 13.05.2026 SUNITA AND ORS. ...Petitioners Vs. UTTRI HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM AND ANR. …Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Rajesh Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Vivek Saini, Advocate with Mr. Arnav Goel, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2-UHBVN *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking modification of order dated 28.12.2023 whereby respondent has determined compensation of Rs.12,00,875/-. 2. On 21.01.2026, the following order was passed by this Court:- “Counsel for the petitioners has invited the attention of the Court to notification dated 08.07.2019, Annexure P-4, issued by the Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam (UHBVN), which provides for the procedure for determining compensation to injured/deceased in cases of fatal/non-fatal accidents due to electrocution. Counsel asserts that interest on the compensation amount is also liable to be paid by the respondents. In particular, reference has been made to para 11 of the policy, which is reproduced hereun