Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-07

SUNITA AND ORS. vs SATBIR AND ORS.

Citation / case number
FAO 5193/2023
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SUNITA AND ORS.
Respondent
SATBIR AND ORS.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

FAO-5193-2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 120 FAO-5193-2023(O&M) Date of decision: 07.05.2026 Smt. Sunita & Others ...Appellant(s) Vs. Satbir (since deceased) through LRs & Ors. ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present:- Mr. Mohit Kakkar, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Punit Jain, Advocate for respondent No.3. *** NIDHI GUPTA, J. CM-17652-CII-2023 This is an application under Section 5 of Limitation Act for condonation of delay of 63 days in filing the appeal. After going through the contents of the application, which is supported by affidavit of the appellant No.1, the same is allowed subject to all just exceptions and delay of 63 days in filing the present appeal is condoned. MAIN CASE Present appeal has been filed by the claimants seeking enhancement of compensation of Rs.3,79,000/- awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sonipat (hereinafter ‘the learned Tribunal’) vide SUNENA 2026.05.08 14:43 I agree to specified portions of this document FAO-5193-2023 Award dated 11.04.2023 passed in MACP No.117 of 2019 filed under Section 163-A of Motor Vehicles Act (hereinafter “the Act”). The 3 appellants are the 41-year-old widow,