Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-18

SUNIL vs THE PRESIDING OFFICER AND ANOTHER

Citation / case number
CWP 13073/2023
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SUNIL
Respondent
THE PRESIDING OFFICER AND ANOTHER
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (261) CWP-13073-2023 Date of Decision : 18.05.2026 Sunil …Petitioner Versus Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, Panipat and another ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present: Mr. Nikhil Vats, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Kapil Bansal, DAG, Haryana. None for the respondent No.2. **** KULDEEP TIWARI, J.(ORAL) 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner apprises this Court that the prayer made in the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous since the matter has been compromised/settled between the parties concerned, and therefore, he does not wish to press the instant petition. 2. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed being not pressed. (KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE May 18, 2026 Manpreet Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No MANPREET SINGH 2026.05.19 12:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment