Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-14

SUNIL @ SUNIL KUMAR vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 20760/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SUNIL @ SUNIL KUMAR
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-20760-2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 208 CRM-M-20760-2026 Date of decision: 14th May, 2026 Sunil @ Sunil Kumar ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Sandeep Kumar Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Neeraj Poswal, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. Ms. Deepika, Advocate for the complainant. *** MANISHA BATRA, J (ORAL):- The present petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) by the petitioner seeking grant of anticipatory bail in case bearing FIR No. 08 dated 11.01.2026 registered under Sections 109(1), 115, 126, 190, 191(3), 324(4) and 351(3) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNS’) (Section 61(2) of BNS added later on) and Section 25 of Arms Act, 1959 at Police Station Sahlawas, District Jhajjar. 2. The aforementioned FIR was registered on the basis of a written complaint submitted by the complainant Harsh Kumar Gautam alleging therein that on 10.01.2026, he had gone to village Redhuwas to bring his maternal grandmother back from the house of her maternal aunt (masi). He MOHAMMAD WASEEM ANSARI 202