Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-25

SUNIL KUMAR vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

Citation / case number
CRM-M 29745/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SUNIL KUMAR
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 135 CRM-M-29745-2026 Date of decision: 25.05.2026 SUNIL KUMAR ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ***** Present : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Kachura, Advocate for the petitioner ***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 BNSS for quashing of order dated 04.04.2026 passed by the learned Addl. SDJM, Guruharsahai, vide which the petitioner has been declared proclaimed person. 2. Learned counsel submits that after being summoned in a complaint under Section 138 of N.I. Act, the petitioner was granted regular bail, whereafter, he continued to appear regularly before the trial Court but for 14.01.2026, as he had gone out of station to earn his livelihood, leading to cancellation of his bail and forfeiture of bail/surety bonds. Thereafter, proclamation proceedings were initiated against him, however, without affording the mandatory period of 30 days, he has been declared proclaimed person vide order dated 04.04.2026. His non-appearance was neither intentional nor deliberate but due to the aforesaid bona fide reason. He is ready and willing to j