SUNIL KUMAR vs STATE OF HARYANA

221 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-22125-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 06.05.2026 SUNIL KUMAR ... PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA ... RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. GREWAL Present: Mr. R.S.Dhakla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vijay Kumar, AAG Haryana. **** H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned State counsel has filed the reply by way of affidavit of Meena Kumari, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Women Safety, Karnal and custody certificate in the Court today and the same are taken on record. 2. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition at this stage. 3. Allowed to do so. 4. Dismissed as withdrawn at this stage. 5. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to move a fresh application for bail in case the trial does not make substantial progress. (H.S.GREWAL) 06.05.2026 JUDGE Janki Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No JANKI BHATT 2026.05.07 14:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh