Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-14

SUNIL KUMAR @ SUNIL vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 20505/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SUNIL KUMAR @ SUNIL
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-20505-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr.No.230 CRM-M-20505-2026 Decided on : 14.05.2026 Sunil Kumar @ Sunil ...... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...... Respondent CORAM : HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL *** Present : Mr. Arun Kumar Singal, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Shaveta Sanghi, DAG, Haryana. Sh. Sube S.Kaushik, Advocate for the complainant. *** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J (ORAL) 1. Prayer in the instant petition filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.0211 dated 10.04.2025, registered under Sections 109(1)/115(2)/118(1)/118(2)/351(3) of BNS, 2023, at Police Station Samalkha, Panipat. 2. Brief facts as per the prosecution case are that the petitioner armed with a knife attacked the complainant and caused injuries to him with an intention to kill him due to some land dispute. Hence, the present FIR. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner is MAMTA MALHOTRA innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further 2026.05.15 12:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chand