Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-07

SUNIL KUMAR @ SUNIL KUMAR YADAV vs RANDHIR AND ANR

Citation / case number
CR 3754/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SUNIL KUMAR @ SUNIL KUMAR YADAV
Respondent
RANDHIR AND ANR
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CR-3754-2026 (O&M) 1 131 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-3754-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 04.05.2026 SUNIL KUMAR @ SUNIL KUMAR YADAV ......... Petitioner Versus RANDHIR AND ANR ….... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR Present : Mr. Atul Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner. **** YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR, J. (Oral) 1. This revision petition is directed against the order dated 25.03.2026 (Annexure P-4) passed by the Court of learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Pataudi, vide which the evidence of the defendant/petitioner has been ordered to be closed. 2. In view of the nature of the order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the respondents is dispensed with as it would only delay the proceedings and cause unnecessary expenditure to the said respondents. 3. Before proceeding further, the impugned order dated 25.03.2026 is reproduced as under: “No DW is present. Ld. proxy counsel for defendant sought an adjournment however the same was highly opposed by learned counsel for the plaintiffs submitting therein that the defendant has availed several effective ASGAR ALI 2026.05.07 16:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity