Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-07
SUNIL KUMAR @ SUNIL KUMAR YADAV vs RANDHIR AND ANR
- Citation / case number
- CR 3754/2026
- Court
- Punjab and Haryana High Court
- Petitioner
- SUNIL KUMAR @ SUNIL KUMAR YADAV
- Respondent
- RANDHIR AND ANR
Judgment text excerpt
CR-3754-2026 (O&M) 1 131 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-3754-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 04.05.2026 SUNIL KUMAR @ SUNIL KUMAR YADAV ......... Petitioner Versus RANDHIR AND ANR ….... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR Present : Mr. Atul Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner. **** YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR, J. (Oral) 1. This revision petition is directed against the order dated 25.03.2026 (Annexure P-4) passed by the Court of learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Pataudi, vide which the evidence of the defendant/petitioner has been ordered to be closed. 2. In view of the nature of the order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the respondents is dispensed with as it would only delay the proceedings and cause unnecessary expenditure to the said respondents. 3. Before proceeding further, the impugned order dated 25.03.2026 is reproduced as under: “No DW is present. Ld. proxy counsel for defendant sought an adjournment however the same was highly opposed by learned counsel for the plaintiffs submitting therein that the defendant has availed several effective ASGAR ALI 2026.05.07 16:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity