Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-20

SUNIL KUMAR DHAWAN vs STATE OF PUNJAB

Citation / case number
CRM-M 20777/2023
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SUNIL KUMAR DHAWAN
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-20777-2023(O&M) - 1- 103 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-20777-2023(O&M) Date of Decision:20.05.2026 Sunil Kumar Dhawan …Petitioner vs. State of Punjab and another …Respondents Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present : Mr. Arnav Ghai, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Rana, Sr. DAG, Punjab. Mr. Akhilesh Vyas, Advocate for respondent No.2. *** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. with a prayer to set aside the impugned order 28.09.2017 (Annexure P- 1) passed by the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Amritsar, whereby, the petitioner has been summoned as an additional accused to face the trial along with the accused, who are already facing the prosecution. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has vehemently argued that a property dispute was already pending between the family members of Kuljit Singh, complainant, who is also an Advocate by profession, on the one hand and the accused party on the other hand. As a matter of record, at about 12.00 noon on 03.01.2012, the complainant side came at the property in dispute and in HEMLATA 2026.05.27 16:18 I attest to