SUNIL KUMAR BANSAL vs STATE OF HARYANA ANF OTHERS

124. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2026: PHHC 080978 CWP No.16249-2026(0&M) Date of Decision: 22.05.2026 Sunil Kumar Bansal -++-Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: Mr. Dinesh Arora, Advocate Mr. Snehdeep Kaswan, Advocate Mr. Jatin Sehra, Advocate,for the petitioner Mr. Deepak Vashisht, D.A.G, Haryana ah a at JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondents to release payment with respect to work carried out by him for the respondent along with interest @ 18% per annum. 2. Learned State counsel, on instructions from Mr. Rohit Kumar, Executive Engineer, PHED, Division No. 1, Rohtak and Mr. Naveen Kumar, Executive Engineer, PHED, Division No. | Gohana, Sonepat, submits that admitted liability would be discharged within six months from today subject to verification. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent may be subjected to interest @ 18% per annum from the date of passing bills. 4. In the wake of statement of both sides, the petition stands disposed of with