Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-25

SUNIL KUMAR AND OTHERS vs ANURAG RASTOGI AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
COCP 304/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SUNIL KUMAR AND OTHERS
Respondent
ANURAG RASTOGI AND OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 104 COCP No.304 of 2026 Date of decision: May 25th, 2026 Sunil Kumar and others .....Petitioners Versus Anurag Rastogi and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr. Dalbir Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana with Principal Secretary, School Education, Haryana (through V.C.) and respondent No.3 in person. VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that against the judgment dated 14.11.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge of which contempt is alleged, the respondents have filed two LPAs as two writ petitions were decided vide judgment dated 14.11.2025. It is submitted that in both the LPAs, Division Bench of this Court was pleased to issue notice of motion and also grant interim order in favour of the respondents herein. It is further submitted that the cost as imposed on the last date has also been paid to the petitioners. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that in view of the same, the present petition be disposed of but liberty be granted to the petitioners to revive/file fresh contempt p