Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-14

SUMIT vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 26366/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SUMIT
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-26366-2026 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 227 CRM-M-26366-2026 (O&M) Date of decision:14.05.2026 Sumit ... Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Anshuman Dalal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.K. Panwar, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. ... Manisha Batra, J. (Oral). 1. The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail to him in case arising out of FIR No.226, dated 07.11.2025, registered under Sections 115, 117(2), 126, 351 and 3(5) of the BNS, at Police Station City Dadri, District Charkhi Dadri. 2. The aforementioned FIR was registered on the basis of statement recorded by complainant – Bharat @ Shubham, alleging therein that he was working in G.K. Hospital, Dadri and used to travel to Dadri from village Kheri Bura, where his maternal uncle resided. On 05.11.2025, he had gone to attend a marriage at village Dubaldhan, where a verbal alteration had taken place between him and accused Mohit HARJEET KAUR 2026.05.15 10:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-263