Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-21

SUMIT AND OTHERS vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
CWP 15947/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SUMIT AND OTHERS
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

124 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-15947-2026 Date of decision: 21.05.2026 Sumit and others ....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Mr. Ravinder Malik, Advocate and Mr. Anuj Malik, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Piyush Khanna, Addl.A.G., Haryana. HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL) 1. The present civil writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to permit the petitioners to register and submit their applications on the job security portal and to resolve the issue relating to OTP generation, non-reflection of employee data and registration of the petitioners on the online job security portal so as to enable the petitioners to register themselves and avail the benefit of security of service under the Haryana Contractual Employees (Security of Service) Act, 2024. Further, directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners for grant of benefit of security of service by counting their entire contractual service rendered with HARCO Bank/Sonepat Central Cooperativ