Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-27

SUMANTA CHATTERJEE AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

Citation / case number
CRM-M 22052/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SUMANTA CHATTERJEE AND ANOTHER
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-22052-2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 259 CRM-M-22052-2026 Date of Decision: 27.05.2026 SUMANTA CHATTERJEE AND ANOTHER ......Petitioners Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Kamal Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Neeraj Poswal, AAG, Haryana. Ms. Anjali Chaudhary, Advocate for Mr. Gaurav Verma, Advocate for respondent No.2. MANISHA BATRA J. (Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS (corresponding Section 482 of Cr.P.C.) for quashing of FIR No.181 dated 06.09.2025 registered under Sections 289, 125-B, 3(5) of BNS (earlier Section 287 IPC, 338 IPC and Section 34 of IPC) at Police Station Sector 31, District Faridabad, Haryana along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 16.04.2026 (Annexure P-2). 2. This Court vide order dated 22.04.2026 had directed the parties to appear before the trial Court to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. 3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the lear