Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-19

SULTAN SINGH AND OTHERS vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
LPA 1446/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SULTAN SINGH AND OTHERS
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

LPA-1446-2026 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 110 LPA-1446-2026 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: 19.05.2026 SULTAN SINGH AND OTHERS …Appellants Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ... Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA Present: Mr. A.S. Narang, Advocate for the appellants. **** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (ORAL) 1. In the present appeal, the challenge is to the order dated 07.10.2022 (Annexure P-6) passed by the revenue authorities partitioning the land between the co-sharers by sanctioning the Naksha-Bay, which partition proceedings have been upheld by the learned Single Judge initially vide judgment dated 13.11.2024 and later on while dismissing the review on 15.01.2026. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants argues that the frontage given on the road is not commensurate to the share of the appellants hence, the learned Single Judge as well as the authorities i.e., respondents No.2 to 4 failed to appreciate the same fact causing prejudice to the appellants. 3. Learned counsel for the appellants further argues that the partition has been done, in a manner which causes prejudice to th