SULEKH MALIK vs AQIL AHMED & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 13.05.2026 + CONT.CAS(C) 272/2024 and CM APPLs.9338/2024, 5033/2025, 51019/2025, 56678/2025, 61832/2025, 69360/2025, 7668/2026 SULEKH MALIK .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhinav Sharma and Mr. Ujjwal Jain, Advs. versus AQIL AHMED & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Beenashaw N. Soni, SC and Ms. Mansi Jain, Adv., MCD. Mr. Ajjay Arora, Sr. Adv., Mr.Uttam Datt, Sr. Adv. and Mr. Vansh Luthra, Adv. for intervenor. Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv., Mr. Tushar Gupta, Mr. Lakhvinder Singh and Mr. Ameesh Kumar, Advs. for RWA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA SACHIN DATTA, J. (ORAL) 1. The present petition alleges wilful disobedience of the directions contained in the order dated 26.05.2023 passed in W.P.(C) 3454/2022 and order dated 12.07.2023 passed in LPA No. 541/2023. The operative directions contained in the order dated 26.05.2023 passed in W.P.(C) 3454/2022 are as under: “9. Considering the facts stated in the status report that demolition action has already been taken on number of occasions, the petition is disposed of with the direction that concerned A.E. (Building) shall Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:ROHIT CONT.CAS(C) 272/2024 Page 1 of 4 KUMAR PATEL Signing Date:18.05.2026 10:12:52 ensure that the requisite action is taken in entirety after duly serving all the owners/occupiers who shall also be at liberty to seek their remedies as available under law. 10. Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2 submits that as and when any request is received for police assistance, the same would be duly provided.” 2. During the course of these proceedings, it transpires that some proceedings have been initiated before the ATMCD. The order dated 07.11.2025, passed in the present proceedings, rec