Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-05-13

SULEKH MALIK vs AQIL AHMED & ANR.

Citation / case number
CONT.CAS(C)-272/2024 2026:DHC:4340
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
SULEKH MALIK
Respondent
AQIL AHMED & ANR.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 13.05.2026 CONT.CAS(C) 272/2024 and CM APPLs.9338/2024, 5033/2025, 51019/2025, 56678/2025, 61832/2025, 69360/2025, 7668/2026 SULEKH MALIK .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhinav Sharma and Mr. Ujjwal Jain, Advs. versus AQIL AHMED & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Beenashaw N. Soni, SC and Ms. Mansi Jain, Adv., MCD. Mr. Ajjay Arora, Sr. Adv., Mr.Uttam Datt, Sr. Adv. and Mr. Vansh Luthra, Adv. for intervenor. Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv., Mr. Tushar Gupta, Mr. Lakhvinder Singh and Mr. Ameesh Kumar, Advs. for RWA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA SACHIN DATTA, J. (ORAL) 1. The present petition alleges wilful disobedience of the directions contained in the order dated 26.05.2023 passed in W.P.(C) 3454/2022 and order dated 12.07.2023 passed in LPA No. 541/2023. The operative directions contained in the order dated 26.05.2023 passed in W.P.(C) 3454/2022 are as under: “9. Considering the facts stated in the status report that demolition action has already been taken on number of occasions, the petition is disposed of with the direction that concerned A.E. (Building) shall 10. Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2 s