Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-21

SULAKSHNA BRAMTA vs STATE OF PUNJAB

Citation / case number
CRM-M 3547/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SULAKSHNA BRAMTA
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

206 2026:PHHC:080371 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-3547-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 21.05.2026 SULAKSHNA BRAMTA «PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB «+s RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present: Mr. Rajiv Kataria, Advocate and Ms. Dolly, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Hardeep Hans, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Ramdeep Partap Singh, Advocate, Mr. Sahil Koul, Mr. Prabsimran Singh, Advocates, Mr. Amar Singh, Advocate for the complainant. MANDEEP PANNU, J (ORAL) 1. The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in FIR No.37 dated 10.04.2018 registered under Sections 385, 387, 389, 506 and 509 of IPC, at P.S Phase 11, SAS Nagar, Mohali. 2. This Court vide order dated 22.01.2026, while issuing notice of motion, granted the concession of interim bail to the petitioner, subject to her joining the investigation. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in pursuance to the order dated 22.01.2026, the petitioner has joined the investigation. 4. Learned State counsel does not controvert the said fact and further submits that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required.