Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-21

SULAKSHNA BRAMTA vs STATE OF PUNJAB

Citation / case number
CRM-M 3433/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SULAKSHNA BRAMTA
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-3433-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No206-2 CRM-M-3433-2026 Date of Decision: 21.05.2026 SULAKSHNA BRAMTA ...Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present:- Mr. Rajiv Kataria, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Hardeep Hans, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Ramdeep Pratap Singh, Advocate for the respondent/complainant. ***** MANDEEP PANNU, J. (Oral) 1. Present petition has been filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quashing of the order dated 04.09.2025 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Mohali whereby bailable warrants were issued against the petitioner in FIR No.37 dated 10.04.2018 registered under Sections 385, 387, 389, 506 and 509 IPC at Police Station Phase-11, SAS Nagar, Mohali. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that initially the present FIR was registered against co-accused Liladhar Tapriya and after completion of investigation, report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. was submitted on 15.07.2025. It has further been argued that subsequently the police ANU 2026.05.21 17:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Cha