SUKLHAN MASIH @ AJAY KUMAR vs STATE OF HARYANA

1 CRM-M-17658-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 216-1 Decided on : 19.05.2026 CRM-M-17658-2026 SULKHAN MASIH @ AJAY KUMAR ....Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA .....Respondent 216-2 CRM-M-17706-2026 NEERAJ SAINI ....Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH Present:- Mr. Randeep S. Dhull, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Pawan Kumar Jhanda, Senior DAG, Haryana. ***** SANJAY VASHISTH, J. (Oral) 1. By way of common order, both the above-mentioned petitions are disposed of together as they are arisen out of the 2. Out of total ten prosecution witnesses, as per information, nine witnesses already stands examined. PREETI 2026.05.20 12:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 CRM-M-17658-2026 3. Getting apprised with the stage of the trial and though there is no one to inform the petitioner(s) in the present case(s) and getting apprised with the proceedings of the trial Court, this Court refrains itself from leading with the plea of bail, at this stage i.e. fag end of the trial, however, petition(s) are disposed of with a direction to the trial Court to finalize its proceeding, within three