Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-27

SUKHWINDER SINGH @ BAO vs STATE OF PUNJAB

Citation / case number
CRM-M 30913/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SUKHWINDER SINGH @ BAO
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH. 142 CRM-M-30913-2026 (O&M). Date of Decision: 27.05.2026. SUKHWINDER SINGH @ BAO ... Petitioner(s) Versus STATE OF PUNJAB .. Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ. PRESENT: Mr. Sukhbir Maandi, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. Mohit Kapoor, Sr. DAG, Punjab. VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J (ORAL) Seeking quashing of the Impugned order dated 07.05.2026 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tarn Taran, in case FIR bearing No.12 dated 29.01.2024, under Section 61 of the Punjab Excise Act 1914, registered at Police Station Sadar Tarn Taran, District Tarn Taran, whereby proclamation proceedings have been initiated against the petitioner, the present petition has been filed. It is evident that the proclamation has not been made so far and thus the present petition is pre-mature at this stage. Faced with the above, counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the present petition at this stage with liberty to take recourse to his remedies and to appear before the trial Court and furnish bail bonds, if so advised. Disposed of as withdrawn with liberties as aforesaid. May 27, 2026. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) raj arora