Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-07

SUKHVEER SINGH @ SUKHBIR SINGH @ BHIMA AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

Citation / case number
CRM-M 9196/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SUKHVEER SINGH @ SUKHBIR SINGH @ BHIMA AND ANOTHER
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-9196-2026 (O&M) 1 269 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-9196-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 07.05.2026 SUKHVEER SINGH @ SUKHBIR SINGH @ BHIMA AND ANOTHER ... PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER ... RESPONDENTS CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present:- Mr. Gurmanpreet Singh, Advocate for Mr. Naveen Bawa, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Surinderjit Singh Nahar, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Vishnu Dutt, Advocate for respondent No. 2. H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 BNSS for quashing of FIR No. 200 dated 21.11.2020 under Sections 323, 324, 506, 148 and 149 of IPC (Section 201 of IPC added later on) registered at Police Station Shimlapuri, District Ludhiana and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise (Annexure P-2). 2. This Court vide order dated 18.02.2026 had directed the parties to appear before the trial Court to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. 3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ludhiana and go