Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-11

SUKHPAL SINGH @ SUKHPAL @ SUKHA vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 18183/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SUKHPAL SINGH @ SUKHPAL @ SUKHA
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-18183-2026 (O & M) ::1:: (217) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-18183-2026 (O & M) Date of Decision: 11.05.2026 Sukhpal @ Sukha ... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Deepak, Advocate with Mr. Subhash Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vipul Sherwal, AAG, Haryana **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. The prayer in the present petition under Section 483 BNSS is for the grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case bearing FIR No.783 dated 29.12.2023 under Sections 323, 324, 326, 147, 148, 149, 341, 427 and 506 IPC, registered at Police Station Rania, District Sirsa (initially Section 307 IPC removed and Section 326 IPC added). 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that a compromise has been arrived at between the parties. As the petitioner is in custody since 29.12.2023 but none out of the 20 prosecution witnesses has been examined so far, the Trial of the present case is not likely to be concluded anytime soon and therefore, the petitioner is entitled to the concession of regular bail. VISHAL SETHI 2026.05.12 11:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of th