Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-14

SUDESH KANDIV vs UNION TERRITORY OF CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
CWP 5665/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SUDESH KANDIV
Respondent
UNION TERRITORY OF CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CWP-5665-2026 1 2026:PHHC:076392-DB 250-4 —_ IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-5665-2026 Date of decision:-14.05.2026 Sudesh Kandiv ...Petitioner Versus Union Territory of Chandigarh and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL HON’ BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present :- Mr. Ram Bhati, Advocate for Mr. Navjit Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Himanshu Arora, Addl. Standing Counsel, U.T. Chandigarh with Mr. Sachit Singla, Advocate for U.T. Chandigarh — respondent No.1 to 5. 2k 2s 2k SUVIR SEHGAL, J.(ORAL) 1. For orders, see order of even date passed in CWP-37036- 2025 titled “Mohit Aggarwal and another Versus Union Territory of Chandigarh and others”. (SUVIR SEHGAL) JUDGE (VIKAS SURD 14.05.2026 JUDGE Brij Whether speaking/reasoned —: Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No