Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-27

SUBHASH vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 29633/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SUBHASH
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-29633-2026 (O&M) -1 216 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-29633-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision:27.05.2026 Subhash …Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana …Respondent Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present: Mr. Keshav Pratap Singh, Advocate Mr. Bharat Singh, Advocate Mr. Nitin Sansanwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajiv Sidhu, Sr.DAG, Haryana. Mr. Sukesh Kumar Jindal, Advocate Mr. Tajinder Malik,Advocate for the complainant. *** N.S.Shekhawat J.(Oral) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 483 of B.N.S.S,2023 with a prayer to grant of regular bail to him in case FIR No. 187, dated 08.06.2025, registered under Sections 109(1), 103(1), 3(5), 351(3) of B.N.S, 2023 and Section 25 of Arms Act,{302,307,34,506 of IPC}, Police Station Madlauda, District Panipat. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the F.I.R in the present case was registered on the basis of the complaint moved by Ram Chander, who alleged that about 35 years ago, the complainant and the HITESH 2026.05.29 15:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh CRM-M-29633-2026 (O&M) -2 petitioner had jointly