Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-06

SUBHASH CHAND vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR.

Citation / case number
CRR 448/2017
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SUBHASH CHAND
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRR-448-2017 (O&M) -1- 221 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR-448-2017 (O&M) Reserved on: 05.05.2026 Pronounced on: 06.05.2026. Subhash Chand …Petitioner vs. State of Haryana and another …Respondents Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present : Mr. Tanmoy Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajiv Sidhu, Sr. DAG, Haryana. Mr. Abhimanyu Kalsy, Advocate for Mr. Rakesh Dhiman, Advocate for respondent No.2. *** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner has filed the present revision petition against the impugned judgment dated 13.01.2017 passed by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Gurgaon as well as the judgment of conviction dated 29.10.2013 and order of sentence dated 30.10.2013 passed by the Court of Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Gurgaon, whereby the petitioner was ordered to be convicted for the commission of offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (hereinafter referred to as the "N.I. Act") and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months and to pay compensation under Section 357(3) Cr.P.C. of Rs.4,50,000/- to the complainant within a period of one month from the date of this judgment and in ca