STATE OF PUNJAGB AND ANR vs SEO CHAND AND ORS

105 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RFA No. 1874 of 2004 (O&M) Date of Decision: 04.05.2026 The State of Punjab and another ...Appellants Versus Seo Chand and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Additional Advocate General, Punjab for the appellants. Mr. Maninder Singh Garcha, Sr. Advocate, assisted by Ms. Mehak Kanwar, Advocate for the PUDA/GMADA None for the respondents-landowners. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) At the outset, learned counsel(s) for the appellant as well as GMADA submit(s) that the present appeal is squarely covered by the judgment dated 05.11.2009 passed by this Court in a bunch of appeals, lead case of which was RFA No. 2378 of 2000, titled “State of Punjab Versus Gurdial Chand and others”, whereby the appeals preferred at the instance of landowners as well as by the State were dismissed, while maintaining the determination of the market value by the learned Reference Court. [2] No one appears on behalf of the respondents-landowners. [3] After going through the judgment passed in Gurdial Chand’s case (supra) as well as the facts of the present case, this Court agrees with the assertion