Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-22

STATE OF HARYANA vs VINAY

Citation / case number
CRM-A 48/2021
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
STATE OF HARYANA
Respondent
VINAY
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-A-48-2021 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-A-48-2021 (O&M) Date of Reserved: 06.05.2026. Date of Pronouncement: 22.05.2026. State of Haryana ....Applicant. Versus Vinay ...Respondent. *** CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR ....... Argued by: Mr. Karan Sharma, DAG, Haryana. Mr. B.S. Mamli, Advocate for the respondent. *** Sukhvinder Kaur, J. 1. Applicant-State has preferred the instant application under Section 378(3) Cr.P.C. seeking leave to appeal against judgment dated 03.04.2019, passed by learned Judge, Special Court, Fatehabad, vide which respondent has been acquitted of offences punishable under Sections 450, 452, 506, 376 of IPC and Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. 2. Brief facts of the prosecution case are that on 21.03.2018, complainant (father of the prosecutrix) gave an application to the police for taking action against Vinay, Baji, Gurpyar, Arjun, Abhishek and Geeta, with the allegations that being a labourer, he often remained out of the house and his wife used to bring grass from the fields. Vinay cousin brother of Arjun KOMAL 2026.05.22 16:25 I att