STATE OF HARYANA vs SUBE SINGH

RSA-3848-2006 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-3848-2006 (O&M) STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ......Appellants Vs. SUBE SINGH .....Respondent Reserved on : 12.05.2026 Pronounced on: 14.05.2026 Uploaded on: 22.05.2026 Whether only the operative part of the judgment is pronounced? NO Whether full judgment is pronounced? YES CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. Harish Nain, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana for the appellant. Mr. Dharam Pal Chachhia, Advocate for the respondent. **** SUDEEPTI SHARMA J. 1. The present appeal is preferred judgment and decree dated 23.08.2006 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Narnaul, whereby, the appeal filed by the appellants against judgment and decree dated 19.02.2005 passed by learned Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Narnaul was dismissed. 2. Brief facts of the case as per the civil suit are that respondent was placed under suspension vide order dated 02.12.1997. He submitted representation against the same but no action was taken. Chargesheet under Rule 7 of Haryana Civil Services (Punishment & Appeal) Rules, 1987 with show cause notice dated 07.01.1999 was served upon the responden